Generic Viagra generic viagra best supplier

Italian Cardinal brands tax evasion a sin!

January 30th, 2012
Angelo Bagnasco calls for ’serious, relentless’ action against tax dodgers, prompting speculation of government accord

It has long been regarded as more of a national sport than a misdemeanor. And it has long benefited from the seemingly boundless indulgence of the Italian Roman Catholic church.

But now the head of the Italian bishops’ conference, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, has unambiguously declared that “evading taxes is a sin”. He called for “serious, effective and relentless” action against tax dodgers.

Among those often accused of avoidance, if not evasion, is the church itself. Its premises are exempt from property tax.

Critics have long maintained that the church takes unfair advantage of a 1982 law intended to benefit non-profitmaking organisations by claiming exemption for income-generating properties it owns, such as private clinics and guesthouses run by religious orders. This and other tax breaks enjoyed by the church have been the subject of an inquiry by the European commission.

The head of the Italian bishops told his fellow prelates the church did not seek “improper self-exemption”.

www.guardian.co.uk

Greece Publishing Names of Tax Dodgers

January 30th, 2012

Tax evasion is endemic in Greece and its international lenders, the EU and the IMF, have insisted Athens improve tax collection if they are to continue bankrolling the debt-laden country

The list of 4,000 top tax dodgers released late on Sunday includes a host of convicted tax frauds and failed businessmen, a prominent singer, the husband of a former government minister as well as a retired basketball star who was recently released from a two-year jail term for illegally owning an arms cache.

Athens has been threatening to publish the list for months and had to change privacy laws to follow through on the threat. It had been kept in a safe in parliament, where lawmakers were allowed to read it without taking notes.

Topping the list with arrears of 952 million euros is a convicted tax fraud who is already serving a 504-year prison sentence for issuing fake receipts to companies that wanted to lower their tax bill.

Greece has about 60 billion euros ($77.52 billion) in unpaid taxes, a figure equivalent to about a quarter of its economy, according to an EU report published in November.

Just 8 billion euros of that amount can be quickly recovered, the EU said, though even that is a sum big enough to cut the country’s budget deficit by half.

www.reuters.com

18,700 properties in London owned by offshore companies

January 28th, 2012

Figures released by the Land Registry reveal that more than £100 billion of property in central London alone is held in offshore companies and therefore avoids certain taxes

The Sunday Times analyzed an inventory of 18,700 title deeds, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, and found that millions of pounds could be lost through a loophole.

By holding property through offshore companies home owners can avoid weighty stamp duty land taxes.

For properties over £1m stamp duty is calculated at 5% of the property price. But stamp duty can be reduced to 0.5% if a property is transferred through the sale of company shares instead of through the usual transaction between individuals.

Placing property in offshore companies can also mean the avoidance of inheritance tax, charged at 40%.

Experts calculate that the tax dodge means around £330m-£500m a year is lost in stamp duty and £1.3 billion in inheritance tax.

More than one in 20 properties in Central London are owned offshore, while cities such as Manchester, Leeds, Derby and Coventry are also popular with property owners using tax havens.

www.thesundaytimes.co.uk

The Worlds Greatest Sailing Yacht Sold, at 40% discount!

August 13th, 2009

The Maltese Falcon Sold

Tom Perkins, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist and ultra-millionaire, finally sold his super yacht, the Maltese Falcon.

The reported price tag: 60 million pounds, according to the British newspaper The Times. After nearly a year on the market, the price was trimmed from about 90 million pounds, which is believed to be about what Perkins had paid for the boat.

“It has taken a while,” Perkins told The Times. “It is not the best time in the world to sell it. I can’t tell you anything at all about the buyer. There is confidentiality.”

The 289-foot-long Maltese Falcon (home page here) was built in Turkey three years ago and has been a frequent visitor to the Port of Monaco, where we spotted it in front of our vantage point.

The luxurious yacht features a model Maserati car, two VIP suites, private gyms and a hotel staff of about 20. The boat carries the Deep Flight Super Falcon, a two-man submarine built to travel at 1,500 foot depths. Perkins told the television show “60 Minutes” the yacht cost more than $150 million but less than $300 million, and he refused to elaborate.

At one point Perkins made the boat available for charter for about $550,000 a week. He has said he made enough money from renting to break even.

Maximum speed of the Maltese Falcon is 18.5 knots, and the boat has a range of 3,000 miles at 14 knots. The sails, mounted on three masts made of carbon fiber, furl and unfurl at the touch of a button. One person can sail the ship from a computerized console.

“I wanted to recapture the grandeur of the clipper ships and bring them into this century,” Perkins told the Chronicle in 2007. He also wanted to own the world’s largest privately owned sailing yacht.

For a while, the Maltese Falcon was the largest in the world. Now that title belongs to the 557-foot-long Eclipse, owned by billionaire Roman Abramovich, a Russian oligarch and it still lags behind the Dubai, the 531-foot vessel owned by Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum, and valued at £212 million ($350 million).

Jim Rogers on China

August 4th, 2009

A YouTube clip:

China is spending its Reserves Building Strategic Infrastructures Jim Rogers

Swiss US showdown at the Corral with UBS stuck in the middle

August 3rd, 2009

(Reuters) – The United States and Swiss bank UBS AG said on Friday they had agreed to settle a dispute over tax evasion and bank secrecy, heading off a showdown that had threatened relations between the two countries.

See article from Yahoo finance here

Reminds me of the the lyrics by Steelers Wheel:

Stuck in the Middle with you Lyrics:
Well, I don’t know why I came here tonight,
I got the feelin’ that somethin’ ain’t right.
I’m so scared in case I fall off my chair,
And I’m wonderin’ how I’ll get down the stairs.
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right,
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

Rest can be found here

Warning: Bubble Ahoy!

August 1st, 2009
The Chinese government stimulous of 500 trillion dollars seems to have pulled the economy out of the recession with GDP expanding by 8% year to date.
We question if the growth is real or just money being transfered from the government to government run companies who in turn are speculating on the stock market.
Recent IPOs out of Shanghai suggest that the Chinese penchant for gambling in the Casinos has split over into the stock exchange as these huge companies, flush with cash, are speculating in stocks rather than pursuing real and economically sustainable projects in the field. It has happened before in recent Chinese boom economy, and it looks like it is happening again as the IPOs  have exploded well past any reasonable valuation of the stocks underlying worth.
All the forced feed government to bank liquidity, that the Chinese banks have in turn injected into their favourtie government coffers is being shoveled into speculative stock plays. As one of our favourite old China hands recently said, he is not buying Chinese stocks now, nor  would we suggest that anyone try there hands in this market. Betteroff going to Macau if you prefer to gamble.

SWISS MUST BE OFFSHORE NO MORE!

July 13th, 2009

Legal justification for bank secrecy does not make it right”

The headline from the lead editorial of the Financial Times of Friday July 10, 2009 is a strong argument for Switzerland to drop the major blocking point for joining the European Union: Sovereignty. That’s right, the Financial Times is advocating that the Swiss drop the prime aspect of the country’s right to self determination, that is, the right to create and administer laws within its own sovereign jurisdiction. 

The Swiss have been drawn into a legal war with the United States by the actions of one of its largest banks, UBS. The Swiss banking giant has admitted and paid nearly one billion dollars to the US government for its actions in aiding and abetting US citizens from evading taxes. Now the Americans want to close down and change the laws on Swiss banking secrecy…that is, the fundamental human right to privacy is being attacked by the Americans and backed by the lackeys in the financial press of major countries.

However, the fact that UBS violated US laws is meaningless in the context of the banks’ adherence to Swiss banking laws in Switzerland. The bank violated laws in the US and should pay, but does that mean that Swiss banking laws are somehow the cause of American problems and should be dismantled?

It is far fetched that the current financial crisis was caused by Swiss bank secrecy laws, but the American (and OECD ) attack on Switzerland has at the center of the controversy the question over the Sovereignty of the Swiss nation. The fact that the US courts want to extend their laws to Switzerland is another sign of US overreach and the imposition of the American way upon other nations and peoples. The question is, are the Swiss willing to fight back against this American aggression or have they already given up?

There is no dispute that UBS violated US laws by illegally soliciting funds of US citizens in the US without registering with the US government authorities. The American citizens violated US laws by not declaring their income held in Switzerland to US authorities.

(Indeed, their Swiss bankers aided and abetted them while earning millions of dollars in fees, and this is why UBS paid such a hefty, and unprecedented fine to the USA.) Yet, these same American citizens and the bank did not violate Swiss laws in any way, shape or form. If the Swiss law calls for complete bank secrecy within the territory of Switzerland this is something for the Swiss to decide, not the American courts.

The Financial Times, and the justice department of the United States are dead wrong when they say in the final sentence of the editorial … “This landlocked country cannot remain offshore forever.” No, the Swiss people and nation have withstood centuries of big countries attempts to diminish their independence. The Nazi boots did not trample the country during the second world war and Yankee and other OECD attempts to bully this small country into giving up its sovereignty should think twice before trying to impose their laws on this country. The question is: will the Swiss stand up this time or not?

Perhaps, bank secrecy is not so important to Switzerland any longer, however, sovereignty should be. In case the people in the small cantons have forgotten and  maybe it is time for the Swiss to take a page from the slogan of one of the American states: “Live free or die”. Swiss laws by are for the Swiss nation, and should be decided upon in the democratic fashion of one of the most democratic places on earth.

Summer Time is Playtime for the Billionnaires

July 13th, 2009

We just spotted this Philip Stark designed 390 feet super yacht formerly called Project Sigma outside of Monaco, now owned by the Billionnaire Andrey Melnichenko (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Melnichenko).

See the youtube.com shot here Yacht A.

Both sides are open and the artificial beach is out.

Comment to Obama on Taxes

May 28th, 2009

The U.S. tax code is “full of corporate loopholes that make it perfectly legal for companies to avoid paying their fair share.”

- President Obama, May 4

Indeed Mr. President, the US tax code is too complex should be simplified and overhauled. Yet, we all know that this will not happen today, tomorrow or in any future Obama administration. Still, the calls by politicians of all stripes to cast blame on others while they themselves do not enforce laws or regulations does put into question Obama’s claim that this will be the most transparent administration in history. During his press conference the President could not help but to point and wag the finger at the tax cheats, even if these “cheats” follow the law.

For the President, members of Congress or Gordon Brown and  the back benchers in the House of Commons,  it is far easier to divert attention from the massive expansion of both taxes and spending of these governments and place the  blame on small offshore centers for the collapse of the banking and financial system.  When the greatest economic power in the world attempts to shift responsibility for massive regulatory and financial oversight from itself to small newly independent countries one wonders about the underlying motivation of those in power in Washington and elsewhere.

Indeed, attempting to understand the causes of this unprecedented financial meltdown and explaining to taxpayers how we got into this mess is necessary. However it is disingenuous at best, and smacks of neocolonialism, when the large  G20 countries insist on diminishing the sovereignty of  nations, many of whom are recently independent and derive a large percentage of GDP from financial services, by imposing restriction on their economies while not applying the same standards in their own country.

Granted, the collapse of the financial system did not happen on Obama’s watch, but, the SEC and others regulators are paid to have been watching, and clearly there has been a dereliction of duty somewhere amongst the regulators in those same OECD nations now clamping down on the Swiss and other banking centers. Can we now trust the same people who were asleep on the job to now, somehow, manage to keep our money safe from another financial meltdown?

The attack by the OECD, G20, and the President on international tax havens does raise some interesting questions about blame and how to fix the financial system. However, we question the current administration’s and the OECD motives about casting blame on offshore financial centers and wonder if the President should focus his energy on the shores of the USA for the real culprits of this systemic crisis.

The fact is that this financial crisis has its roots in the failure of American regulatory officials to manage the risk positions of US Banks and insurance companies, was not mentioned by the President during his press conference. Instead, the President made it clear that all the bad guys had hide out in “unregulated” sectors in Switzerland, the Cayman Islands or other offshore centers and the good guys in white hats in Washington are unable to stop them because of lax international regulation.

The President used his May 4 news conference to play on the popular perception that somehow the massive financial collapse was perpetuated by greedy bankers, tax evaders and cheaters in New York and London who stole money from Joe Six Pack and then hid it in some un-regulated island paradise. Yet, as the President acknowledged in his speech, the US tax system is as much to blame for the financial mess that we are in, as the poor performance of the SEC and other US bank regulators

Indeed, if the US is really serious about global tax harmonization and regulation of offshore business, the President may wish to have a very close look at American tax regulations, SEC oversight of a very tarnished banking sector, and up close examination of why public stock listed American companies overwhelmingly incorporate in Delaware.

Claims by the President not withstanding, the Cayman Islands, where many American multinationals and banks have registered companies, including all of the TARP recipients of billions of US taxpayer funds, have much stricter corporate and banking restrictions than any of the US tax havens.

Again, the Americans should practice what they preach. Did you know that Wyoming, Nevada and Delaware do not adhere to the OECD guidelines on beneficiary ownership and other disclosures requirements, the type of restrictions that the big countries are imposing on the small offshore centers worldwide?

To single out the Caymans for public shaming because Bernie Madoff had a company there while he creating the largest Ponzi ever right under the nose of the SEC is comical.  It is great for getting a headline, but does nothing for resolving the serious defects in the American regulatory system.

Surely, it is reasonable for the American President to insist that American multinationals pay their “fair share” of taxes. However, to claim that multinationals are cheaters then to blame other nations for their actions and  placing these countries on “black-lists” for not agreeing to be regulated by the same people who brought you Enron, World Com, and other corporate accounting scandals is over the top even for a politician.

Lets not forget that Enron,  the largest corporate ponzi scheme in history, was fully audited by the biggest accounting firms in the world and operating under the close supervision of the SEC for years undetected as a NYSE company. Now the President would have us all accept this same “highest standards” regulatory regime of the SEC and others by threatening smaller countries with economic blackmail.

American multinational corporations, like most corporations and citizens, are just following the law, however convoluted these tax laws might be in the US. The Americans should have respect for international law and sovereignty of nations must be respected.

First, Mr. President we suggest that you enforce your own laws on your own shores and implement the guidelines you call of in the OECD before trying to export stricter laws on other countries who have not contributed to the financial collapse which was made in the USA.

America, it is time to police your own states and clean up the cesspool in your own financial backyard. Try this before bringing your messy ways to legitimate businesses in small offshore jurisdictions and sovereign nations.

Mr. President, before you go about making all Americans pay their fair share of the TARP and other bailouts brought on by US regulatory incompetence, you should think twice about imposing your will on small countries that may have a better regulatory sector than your own when it comes to keeping the financial sector operating and not collapsing.